Relative clauses
Relative clauses (連体修飾, rentai shūshoku) are clauses that modify a noun, placed before it, as in 昨日買った本 (kinō katta hon, the book I bought yesterday). Japanese has no relative pronoun like 'which' or 'who'; the entire clause directly precedes the noun, and the relationship is understood from context.
What Is a Relative Clause?
In Japanese, a relative clause is a clause that modifies a noun, providing additional information about it. Unlike English, where the relative clause follows the noun and is introduced by a relative pronoun (who, which, that), Japanese places the entire clause before the noun, with no connecting word. For example:
- 昨日買った本(きのうかったほん)— the book I bought yesterday
- 日本語を勉強している人(にほんごをべんきょうしているひと)— a person who is studying Japanese
The modifying clause functions like a long adjective. This structure is called 連体修飾(れんたいしゅうしょく), literally 'adnominal modification'.
Why the Description Comes First
Japanese word order is fundamentally head-final: modifiers precede what they modify. This applies to adjectives (赤い車, akai kuruma, red car), possessive phrases (私の本, watashi no hon, my book), and relative clauses alike. The noun is the last element, and everything that describes it comes before. This is a consistent principle that makes Japanese sentence structure predictable once you know it.
This order reflects how Japanese builds meaning: you accumulate information and then reveal the core noun at the end. In English, we often state the noun first and then add details. In Japanese, you hear the details first and the noun last, which can feel like a puzzle until you get used to it.
No Relative Pronoun: How Does It Work?
English uses 'who', 'which', 'that' to signal the start of a relative clause and to indicate the role of the noun within the clause (subject, object, etc.). Japanese has no such word. Instead, the clause is simply placed before the noun, and the listener infers the relationship from context and the case particles within the clause.
For instance, in 昨日買った本 (kinō katta hon), the verb 買った (katta, bought) is transitive, and 本 (hon, book) is understood as its object. There is no marker saying 'which' or 'that'; the meaning is clear because the noun fills the missing object slot.
Similarly, in 日本語を勉強している人 (Nihongo o benkyō shite iru hito), the noun 人 (hito, person) is the subject of the verb 勉強している (studying). The particle を marks the object of the verb, so the noun must be the subject.
This system works because Japanese verbs clearly indicate transitivity, and particles like を (o) and が (ga) mark grammatical roles within the clause. The listener reconstructs the relationship by parsing the clause's internal structure.
The Role of Particles
Particles are essential in relative clauses. They show how the noun relates to the verb inside the clause. For example:
- 私が書いた手紙(わたしがかいたてがみ)— the letter I wrote (私が is subject, 手紙 is object)
- 彼がくれた本(かれがくれたほん)— the book he gave me (彼が is subject, 本 is object)
- 住んでいる町(すんでいるまち)— the town where I live (no particle, but 町 is the location of 住む)
Sometimes the particle is omitted if it is clear from context, but it is often retained to avoid ambiguity.
Types of Relative Clauses
Relative clauses can be classified by the grammatical role of the modified noun within the clause:
- Subject: 日本語を勉強している人 (a person who is studying Japanese) — 人 is the subject of 勉強している.
- Object: 昨日買った本 (the book I bought yesterday) — 本 is the object of 買った.
- Location: 住んでいる町 (the town where I live) — 町 is the location of 住む.
- Time: 会った日(あったひ)— the day we met — 日 is the time of 会った.
- Possessive: 目が青い人(めがあおいひと)— a person whose eyes are blue — 人 is the possessor of 目.
In each case, the noun is not explicitly marked within the clause; its role is inferred from the verb's meaning and the presence of other particles.
Common Mistakes and Nuances
One common mistake for learners is trying to insert a relative pronoun like 'which' or 'who'. There is no equivalent, so you must simply place the clause before the noun.
Another nuance is that the modified noun can be omitted if it is obvious from context, but that is a separate phenomenon (nominalization).
Also, note that the tense in a relative clause is relative to the main clause, not absolute. For example, 昨日買った本 (kinō katta hon) uses past tense because the buying happened before now. But in a sentence like 彼が来る日(かれがくるひ)— the day he comes — the present tense 来る is used even if the coming is in the future, because the clause's tense is relative to the main clause's time frame.
Practice and Mastery
Understanding relative clauses is crucial for reading and listening comprehension, as they appear constantly. To master them, practice by breaking down complex sentences into the main clause and the modifying clause. Pay attention to how particles inside the clause reveal the relationship.
You can also practice with sentence-building exercises, such as the Sentence Builder game, which helps you construct sentences with correct word order. For more on particles, see the Particle Battle game. And for a broader overview of grammar, visit the grammar library.
A common misconception is that Japanese relative clauses require a relative pronoun like 'which' or 'who', but they do not; the clause simply precedes the noun and the relationship is inferred.
Questions
How do you say 'which' in Japanese relative clauses?
There is no word for 'which' in relative clauses. You simply put the clause before the noun, and the relationship is understood from context. For example, 'the book which I bought' is 私が買った本 (watashi ga katta hon), where 買った directly modifies 本.
Can I omit the particle in a relative clause?
Yes, sometimes the particle marking the modified noun's role is omitted if it is clear from context. For example, 住んでいる町 (sunde iru machi) can mean 'the town where I live' without a particle. However, omitting particles can cause ambiguity, so it's safer to include them when needed.
Why does Japanese put the description before the noun?
Japanese is a head-final language, meaning that modifiers (adjectives, relative clauses, etc.) always come before the noun they modify. This is a consistent rule in the language, unlike English, which often places relative clauses after the noun. It reflects a different way of organizing information: you build up details and then state the main noun.