Official Routes Navigator
A source-linked Poland page for MEXT, MIRAI, JLPT, Study in Japan and Japan Foundation resources. Deadlines remain on the responsible organisation’s site.
Nihoner proposes a time-limited public-interest pilot: help people in Poland find official Japan opportunities, practise useful Japanese, and report what they could or could not access—without implying Embassy or government endorsement.
The first version requires no official logo, no shared user database, no claim of approval and no financial commitment from a public body.
A source-linked Poland page for MEXT, MIRAI, JLPT, Study in Japan and Japan Foundation resources. Deadlines remain on the responsible organisation’s site.
A browser tool for planning and rehearsing a short Japanese introduction or speech. Automated feedback is labelled as practice, not teacher assessment.
A short public report covering broken routes, unclear explanations, voluntary usage, learner feedback and limitations—without claiming language gains the pilot did not measure.
The first contact should be about fit and accuracy—not sponsorship.
Confirm whether this public-interest problem is relevant and which office or programme, if any, is appropriate.
Name a public mailbox or official page Nihoner should monitor; no editorial labour is assumed.
Share scope, audience, safeguards, measures and an exit plan for a no-cost 60-day pilot.
For example, an eligible Polish institution, local JLPT host, Japan Foundation contact or education programme.
Trust is easier to build when the boundaries are decided before promotion begins.
Nihoner would not describe itself as approved, official, accredited or recommended.
Co-branding would require separate written permission and an agreed review process.
The first pilot does not require participant lists or access to government systems.
Any later grant or procurement route would follow the published eligibility and application rules.
Anonymous page visits, voluntary tool starts and completions. Numbers are reported as usage—not proof of learning or public support.
Outbound clicks to responsible public sources, broken-link reports and which routes users had difficulty locating.
Short questions about clarity and usefulness, with positive, negative and incomplete responses represented separately.
Small samples, self-selection, device issues, incorrect summaries and other constraints are published with the results.
The appropriate route depends on the activity and may be “no fit.” Nihoner would respect that answer.
Nihoner welcomes corrections to the public-source routing and a conversation about whether a small pilot has a legitimate institutional home.