Nihoner
A proposal—not an announced partnership

A small, useful Poland–Japan learning bridge.

Nihoner proposes a time-limited public-interest pilot: help people in Poland find official Japan opportunities, practise useful Japanese, and report what they could or could not access—without implying Embassy or government endorsement.

案
Status: independent proposalNo Embassy, ministry, university, Japan Foundation or JLPT body has approved or endorsed this pilot.
A 60-day, non-exclusive pilot

Begin with public information and measurable usefulness.

The first version requires no official logo, no shared user database, no claim of approval and no financial commitment from a public body.

路Available now

Official Routes Navigator

A source-linked Poland page for MEXT, MIRAI, JLPT, Study in Japan and Japan Foundation resources. Deadlines remain on the responsible organisation’s site.

声Available now

Speech Practice Lab

A browser tool for planning and rehearsing a short Japanese introduction or speech. Automated feedback is labelled as practice, not teacher assessment.

報Pilot output

Access and correction report

A short public report covering broken routes, unclear explanations, voluntary usage, learner feedback and limitations—without claiming language gains the pilot did not measure.

What Nihoner would ask

A narrow request that is easy to accept or decline.

The first contact should be about fit and accuracy—not sponsorship.

  1. 1
    One 30-minute information meeting

    Confirm whether this public-interest problem is relevant and which office or programme, if any, is appropriate.

  2. 2
    A source-correction route

    Name a public mailbox or official page Nihoner should monitor; no editorial labour is assumed.

  3. 3
    Permission to submit a two-page brief

    Share scope, audience, safeguards, measures and an exit plan for a no-cost 60-day pilot.

  4. 4
    A referral when another body is the right fit

    For example, an eligible Polish institution, local JLPT host, Japan Foundation contact or education programme.

What the first approach does not ask for

No borrowed authority. No premature branding.

Trust is easier to build when the boundaries are decided before promotion begins.

  • ×
    No endorsement statement

    Nihoner would not describe itself as approved, official, accredited or recommended.

  • ×
    No logo use

    Co-branding would require separate written permission and an agreed review process.

  • ×
    No learner-data transfer

    The first pilot does not require participant lists or access to government systems.

  • ×
    No funding request

    Any later grant or procurement route would follow the published eligibility and application rules.

How the pilot would be evaluated

Report what happened, including what did not work.

参

Participation

Anonymous page visits, voluntary tool starts and completions. Numbers are reported as usage—not proof of learning or public support.

到

Official-source reach

Outbound clicks to responsible public sources, broken-link reports and which routes users had difficulty locating.

声

Voluntary feedback

Short questions about clarity and usefulness, with positive, negative and incomplete responses represented separately.

限

Limitations and corrections

Small samples, self-selection, device issues, incorrect summaries and other constraints are published with the results.

Possible public-interest fit

Useful to several institutions without claiming all are partners.

The appropriate route depends on the activity and may be “no fit.” Nihoner would respect that answer.

使
Embassy of Japan in PolandCountry-specific public information, scholarships, culture and exchange notices.
基
The Japan FoundationJapanese-language education, official materials and published support routes.
校
Local educational hostsJLPT and student access questions may belong with the institution named by the official programme.
外
MOFA friendship programmesPeople-to-people exchange objectives and the MIRAI route for Europe.

Invitation to review—not to endorse.

Nihoner welcomes corrections to the public-source routing and a conversation about whether a small pilot has a legitimate institutional home.

Request the pilot brief
Independent proposal by Nihoner · Publication of this page does not indicate contact, approval, affiliation, funding or endorsement by any named institution.